Your employer asks for an off-site data replication strategy that maintains ONTAP data efficiencies. Which two solutions satisfy this requirement?

In the context of an off-site data replication strategy that needs to maintain ONTAP data efficiencies, choosing NetApp Private Storage makes sense due to its ability to integrate seamlessly with existing ONTAP environments while maintaining data efficiencies.

NetApp Private Storage allows organizations to retain control over their data while utilizing the scalability and versatility of cloud resources. This means that the data remains stored within ONTAP's file system integrity, leveraging features such as inline data deduplication, compression, and thin provisioning, which are vital for efficient storage management.

Furthermore, this solution supports other ONTAP functionalities such as SnapMirror for replication, thus ensuring that data can be efficiently transferred to an off-site location while maintaining the efficiencies inherent in the ONTAP platform.

The other options, while valuable in their own ways, might not fully meet the specific requirement of leveraging ONTAP efficiencies in the same manner as NetApp Private Storage. For instance, MAX Data focuses on accelerating workloads across environments rather than primarily on data replication strategies, and while Cloud Volumes Service and Cloud Volumes ONTAP are excellent for cloud storage, their cost structure and the way data is handled may not offer the same level of efficiency preservation as NetApp Private Storage.