True or False: SSDs are generally more reliable and have a longer lifespan than HDDs.

The statement is true because solid-state drives (SSDs) utilize flash memory technology, which is less prone to mechanical failure compared to hard disk drives (HDDs). HDDs rely on spinning disks and read/write heads, which are susceptible to physical shock and wear over time. In contrast, SSDs have no moving parts, which not only makes them more durable in physically challenging environments but also contributes to a longer lifespan under typical usage conditions.

Additionally, SSDs generally offer better performance characteristics, such as faster data access speeds and lower latency, which can lead to a more efficient system overall. While both types of drives eventually wear out, the wear mechanisms for SSDs differ, typically resulting in a longer usable life in many scenarios, especially when considering variable read/write patterns and overall usage.

While it’s important to note that in certain specialized situations, HDDs may outlast SSDs due to factors such as heavy write loads or specific enterprise environments, the general trend in consumer and many professional applications supports the assertion that SSDs are more reliable and have longer lifespans than HDDs.